How great is Stephen from Survivor?

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010 at 11:01 am  
Comments (3)

He’s my favorite by a long shot now. Before, I was going back and forth between him and JT. Stephen was instrumental in getting rid of Tyson and now, he caste the deciding vote to get rid of Coach.

Whew.
correction: *cast*


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Wouldn't the season of Survivor been better if……..?

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010 at 1:31 pm  
Comments (9)

Tyson didn’t change his vote way back when. Don’t get me wrong, I love Parvati, but if he would have voted Jerri out, him, Sandra, Courtney, Rob, and Coach would have been in it. The Final 12 would have been those 5, Amanda, Ruppert, JT, Colby, Candice, Danielle, and Russel. Then, in my opinion, Courtney, Rob, and Tyson would be in the final 3, and Courtney would have won, do you think that would have been better?
Don’t get me wrong, the season was great, I loved it! I was just wondering if that would have been better.
Don’t get me wrong, the season was great, I loved it! I was just wondering if that would have been better.


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Who do you think should have won?

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010 at 11:13 am  
Comments (5)

SURVIVOR HEROES VS VILLAINS.

The winner as we all know was Sandra.
Who do you think should have won the game? and why?

In my humble opinion it shouldn’t have been Sandra… yeah she was the most likable of the three, but she didn’t do anything. She tried and failed (stupid heroes!!!).
Russell is an ass, I agree with most people, but he played a good game, IT’S A GAME REMEMBER!, what he wanted to happen, happened (99% of the times anyway)
And Parvarti (hooot) did great also, cool move to get JT out of the game…

To me, its between Russell and Parvati…. what do you guys think!?
I liked boston rob as well, but he didn’t make it.

And people didn’t vote for Russell because they where sore losers and couldn’t stand the fact that the rude bald man outplayed them. If it where me on the jury I would have voted for Russell, as I said before, he is an ass. But he played well, and I respect that (in the game!), if he was in real life like that I would have him killed.

Anyway… Russell sucks at convincing the jury, I thought he would have learned something by now… guess not


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Who deserved to win Survivor: Heroes VS Villains? …?

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010 at 1:26 am  
Comments (9)

I think Russell deserves to win.

People are forgetting the fact that Parvati wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for Russell! Way back in the beginning, Russell gave Parvati the idol and she saved herself! Russell gave Parvati TWO idols! TWO! Has Parvati ever saved Russell? NOPE!

Sandra…don’t get me started on Sandra! She DID NOT DESERVE TO WIN! What was her strategy? Having no strategy??!?? She was a coattail rider. She did nothing, sucked at challenges, and she had aboslutely no gameplay and strategy, whatsoever!

Parvati was okay. She made a couple of good moves but she didn’t have the best strategy and gameplay.

Now I know Russell doesn’t have the best social game. But I think the gameplay is more important than the social. Survivor is about "outwitting, outplaying, and outlasting", not by flirting or hiding behind bushes! Russell outplayed, outlasted, and outwitted everyone.

This season has been great but the winner is such a huge disappointment! What an anti-climatic ending to such a fantastic season! Russell definitely kept the show entertaining! Without Russell, it wouldn’t have been this dramatic and exciting!! I just think the jury (esp. Danielle) are bitter. They need to forget their hatred and vote on who deserves the million dollars by the person’s GAMEPLAY!

So who deserved to win? Why? And what did you think about this season?
I’ve seen people say that Parvati played the best game….What game???! She just followed Russell! Yeah, she gave Jerri and Sandra the idols….What else? And if it wasn’t for Russells’ idols, she never could of played that move!
*rolls eyes*

What I mean by "deserving" is that who had the better strategy/gameplay.

And if you don’t like this question, don’t answer it. It is my opinion, and calling me "delusional" is just hypocrital. I don’t need any of you people answering MY question. You dare say any of this to my face?
To Kent:
Call me delusional, but what did Sandra DO to "deserve" the million dollars? Tell me these so-called brilliant reasons?

Spare me this BS. Even Jeff Probst said that he wouldn’t vote for Sandra to win. The jury didn’t vote FOR Sandra. They voted AGAINST Russell and Parvati.
This holier-than-thou attitude sickens me.
Sandra was joking when she said she was "against" Russell. She backpeddaled when she said that.


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Survivor: Russell finally admits he may have a problem addressing the jury?

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010 at 6:21 am  
Comments (7)

http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/05/17/survivor-talk-russell-parvati-heroes-vs-villains/

guess his ego got in the way of the million dollar prize and the title of sole survivor. after trying to control his tribe and the game, he failed at controlling his ego during the last tribal council.
All he had to do was say: look, I’m sorry for what I did but it is a game and I had to do what I did because you guys are tough competitors. But noooooooo, instead he said, I’m better than you, deal with it. How does the jury gonna respond to that!? How does anyone? Naturally, people would respond with: ok, fine, you don’t get my vote, you deal with it. All it took from Russell was to manipulate the jury one last time and he choked. He’s not a closer. His address to the jury in the previous season was better than this. I guess he was just burnt out from too much Survivor in the end.


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Is Russell Hantz from Survivor Samoa overrated?

Monday, May 17th, 2010 at 4:23 pm  
Comments (5)

Everyone is like Russell got robbed, the jury is full of sore losers, or Russell played the best game of Survivor ever but I heavily disagree with the last statement. Three sole survivors Todd Herzog, Yul Kwon and JT are all better players. Russell fans fail to realize that courting a jury is a part of the game and Russell’s play only alienated the jury. Todd from Survivor China kept a strong voting alliance working throughout the game without heavily angering so many members. Yul Kwon aka "The Godfather" from Survivor Cook Islands was able to flip a vote and give his outnumbered tribe an advantage and the eliminate the rest of the other tribe one by one. Most of all Yul was able to court the jury in which some members of the other tribe were so angry that Jonathan flipped, they only wanted to be voted out after he was or else they were not going to vote for Yul at the end. Russell was lucky because Galu turned on their own member Erik and then isolated another one of their members Shambo. Russell didn’t need to do much, Galu just self destructed. JT from Survivor Tocantins was able to build good relations with everyone on the other tribe, eliminate the threats without stirring up too much trouble and stay loyal to his biggest partner Stephen. Russell caused unnecessary suffering by emptying canteens and burning socks but I am guessing his fans like that kind of thing. His style of play was great at winning every vote but the last which is all that really matters in the end. I am not saying his style of play was terrible but I am saying it was not the best in Survivor because it focused too much on getting to the end than the end itself.


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Does Amanda win Survivor this season?

Sunday, May 9th, 2010 at 4:04 pm  
Comments (5)

If Parvati, Ceri, or Natalie are smart they will realize Amanda will take the whole cake if she makes it to the final 3!!

What do you think? She obviously has Ozzie’s vote. Probably Jason’s too since Natalie screwed him over. She was OK with Eliza I think.


Related Blogs

 Mail this post

Were Stephen and JT dumb to vote out Tyson on Survivor?

Saturday, April 17th, 2010 at 6:11 am  
Comments (6)

Now they eliminate the warrior allience and may find them selves down in numbers unless Sierra swings. If they kept the warrior allience Sierra would’ve gone home and they would’ve taken out Errin and Taj going to the Final 5.

Some say that the members of Timbira in the group (Tyson, Coach and Debby) would’ve gone after JT or Stephen at that pt The thing is they had the idol which becomes useless after that episode

The smart move would’ve been to get to the Final 5 and once they get their the 3 Timbira members would’ve likely gone after JT (The stronger person)> The smart move would be for JT to play the idol and have him and Stephen vote out Tyson. That would’ve made JT the strongest person going into the last challenge
I’m not talking about whether you’re happy to see Tyson gone but whether it was a smart move for Stephen and JT

They lose an alliance where JT would’ve emerged as the strongest person going into the Final 4 if they played it right
edit- James. God p about how Errin gave JT an idication she’d flip. You also think Sierra would because you know she wants to rub "You made your bed now LAY on it" at Coach. Plus she doesn’t seem to like Errin

Meanwhile she seemed friendly w/Taj at Exile and Stephen and JT haven’t pissed her off yet.

However it seems she may actually stay w/Coach, Debby and Errin


Related Blogs

 Mail this post
 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »
Powered by Yahoo! Answers