I’m so upset about Natalie winning!! She did NOTHING and does not deserve a dime. It is so awful, I can’t believe they voted based on how someone should be outside the game and didn’t realize Russell did all the hard work! What are your thoughts??????????????
I kinda like Sierra, but everyone else seems to hate her. Like Jt was saying how much he wanted her gone and how much he hated her when she was trying to help Brandon help Jt stay in the game. So i don’t know. Do you like her?…….and if not who do you want to win Survivor this year?
LOL i totally agree with marshmellow!!
Dumbest move of the 20 seasons
Colby -taking tina
James – not using one of two immunity idols
Erik -giving his idol away, and got voted out
Tyson – Voting for Parvati and not Russell, and got himself voted out
JT – Giving Russell the idol, thinking he was the next to go, then not listening to Rubin when he told him that Sandra said that Russell is in control, and the idol were not used, JT got voted out
Its down to the final 5 and the finale is sunday. Its 4 villians vs 1 hero.
Villians left:
Russell
Parviti
Jerri
Sandra
Heroes:
Colby
Do you think the jury will let a previous winner win another million (Sandra and Parviti), will they let the most villioness contestant ever (Russel) win, will Colby beat the odds or will Jerri go from the bitch of survivor to winner?
Besides the obvious of blaming the game when you lose, Mark Burnett talks about what Survivor is, a "reality" tv show depicting social dynamics, a social game.
Russell says he has a social game, referring to controlling tribemates like Jerri when it comes time to vote. However, Russell fails to see winning over the jury is part of controlling, part of the social game, and he has failed in that aspect, a very important aspect. All of the BS aside, I think he’s just coming up with excuses to every poignant question, in order to save face or not appear publicly embarrassed, when deep down he knows he has screwed up, but he won’t admit that, publicly at least. It’s understandable that he doesn’t admit that publicly. But my question is why won’t his fans admit that? That’s just disturbing, in a stalkerish way, when people, who don’t know Russell in person or aren’t part of his life in person, are defending Russell like they’re him.
(Russell is like that energy sucker, sucking all of their energy in the tribe)
Russell blames the jury for being too vindictive, but Russell fails to see that is part of the game, dealing with consequences (in other words, your actions within a group can come back to affect you). It’s not like this has only happened when Russell started playing Survivor. Influencing the jury is a main focus of the game Survivor. That’s part of the social aspects that Mark Burnett talked about: to win your peers or to influence your peers to vote for you for the million dollar prize. If it’s the physical surviving that won over Russell’s audience, then maybe the appropriate show for them is Eco Challenge, not Survivor.
Russell talked about winning the Player Of The Season. If that’s any indication of being the best player in Survivor, then what does it mean when Rupert came in close second with only around 2000 votes less than Russell’s (out of millions of votes)? Besides that number being a relatively small percentage, Rupert’s 2nd place shows that the voting for Player Of The Season is an indication of anything but the best player, since Rupert obviously did not play as well as some of the others. One indication for this kind of voting (America’s vote) may be popularity. Another may be a compliment to the editors for convincing America to jump on the Russell wagon. Parvati said it best that (the editors through the use of) Russell brainwashed America to vote for Russell Hantz, even though it was meant as a joke.
"All Russell said was I’m Russell Hantz." lol
Russell fans, do you see the light now? Do you admit that Russell’s game play was ultimately flawed? Why or why not?
Mail this post